Joined: 03 May 2008 Posts: 962 Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 4:44 pm Post subject:
ant_jzs160 wrote:
okay gotta remind myself this isnt a VIP forum BUUUUT imho:
18" = too small, gives too much fender gap. 19" is ideal.
8" front = narrow, like to see 9" up front.
+40 offset = very weak. could drop that to +20 front and rear with those widths and probably still not need to roll or anything
Im no good at being able to judge what offset will be good on what car and what u would need to run such offsets, but are u saying that anything + 40 or over is a weak offset? _________________
mmm depends how wide the wheel is but im slightly in agreeance, my rear is +38 (at 10") and thats slightly weak... clean fit... any skinnier on that kinda offset would be panzy
Joined: 19 May 2008 Posts: 656 Location: Perth - SOR
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 8:06 pm Post subject:
well its all relative, but yes, generally speaking a +40 or above is a weak offset. This is a FWD type offset, or a standard wheel type offset. (and we all know how standard wheels fit!)
VIP_2JZ - its all a matter of just acquiring the knowledge based on the car etc. You can never say "9" +40 is weak all the time" because on a 4WD car or a Van or other FWD vehicle this may be quite aggressive. But when talking RWD Toyotas, generally 9" / 10" is good width, and anything from about +30 downwards is on the right track.
tyre selection and camber also play a large part in aiding to swallow up wheels!
I don't want to have to roll fenders and all that shit
Thats getting closer, @ 9.5 +35 you could go some slip on spacers say 10ml, just get your guards rolled $50 a corner, and you will be balling mate. _________________
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum