track- your kidding right?
one is a sports car, the other is a barge with wheels and an engine capable of reasonable performance if strapped onto something light enough.
im no aristo hater, but jeezuz man there is a reason the extra M badge is a few $$ extra _________________
if my calculations are correct SLINKY + ESCULATOR = EVERLASTING FUN
Joined: 12 May 2008 Posts: 2211 Location: Southside, Adelaide
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 8:27 pm Post subject:
I imagine an E46 and an Aristo would be somewhat comparable in a straight line. The E46 will definitely get up and boogie a lot faster but the Aristo is probably quicker from 60-160? Just random speculation really until someone turns up some numbers.
Joined: 17 May 2009 Posts: 3928 Location: S.E Melbourne
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 8:57 pm Post subject:
I ran a e46 m3 with my old stock twin setup (240rwkw) and was a half a car ahead upto 100kph and pulled away on it to 3-4 car lengths at 160. They only do a 13.3 quarter mile.
Stock aristo whether 147 or 161 wouldnt stand a chance in any way.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum